Remember Ward Churchill, the left wing college professor from Colorado, who compared the victims of 9/11 to Adolf Eichmann (Obersturmbannfuhrer in the Nazi regime, often referred to as "Chief Executioner" of the Third Reich for his role in the extermination of the Jews)?
Churchill wrote that the people in the WTC were:
... too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly, into their cell phones, arranging power lunches and stock transactions, each of which translated, conveniently out of sight, mind and smelling distance, into the starved and rotting flesh of infants. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it (Wikipedia)Churchill, while he was recognized as a villain by normal Americans, the left embraced him and pushed him further. He is still a tenured professor at UC Boulder, and although an investigation has been opened regarding allegations of plagiarism, research fabrication, as well as intimidating his colleagues, it'll never see the light of day. The liberals control too much money for Churchill, a despicable man, to get fired.
Anyway, to my topic...a right wing (read, normal American) professor, Indrek Wichman, at Michigan State University wrote an email, directed at that school's Muslim Students Association. The main contents were this:
...that he was protesting their protest and said he was not offended by cartoons but rather Muslims who commit suicide bombings, behead civilians, attack public buildings, burn Christian churches, kill Catholic priests in Turkey, rape Scandinavian girls and riot in France (Foxnews).Now, I'm not condoning what the guy did, but Lord knows, I agree with him. I know many Muslims...I've been going to school with them since I was very young. I have no problems with the Muslims that want nothing more than to live and serve Allah. What I hate are the same things that Wichman hates, but that's not the point here.
The point is that while Churchill will walk away from the investigation and enjoy his tenure, then later write a book that will pander to the left-wing looneys out there, detailing the neo-McCarthyism he had to endure, Wichman is going to get screwed. I mean, Wichman said something true (all his statements were things that have happened before, and many happen on a daily basis). But, because it offends a group of people that no one wants to offend, he'll get the shaft...big time. He'll be hung out to dry by the university, and forever labeled a racist, because he was exercising his "right to free speech". If one of those Muslims wrote a commentary for the school newspaper, exercising his "right to free speech," detailing the same things, true or not, about Americans, would it be seen in the same light, or would he be applauded for speaking out against a tyrannical regime? I think you know exactly what would happen, and its very sad. Present an anti-establishment, left wing view, and everybody loves you. Present an opposing opinion, and you're a racist, a bigot, a Nazi!!!
When will the lunacy end?
|